<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good Old Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/</link>
	<description>Superintendent of Schools writes about learning and school management in rural Western New York.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:30:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G-Town Critique - Good Old Days &#171; Tnprater1006&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>G-Town Critique - Good Old Days &#171; Tnprater1006&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>[...] http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/" rel="nofollow">http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAM</title>
		<link>http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-4966</link>
		<dc:creator>BAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/#comment-4966</guid>
		<description>I wish I was single and living in 1980 instead of single in 2007....of course in my experience usually even after incessant text messaging conversation could still be found if both parties were trying. It seems that the case is often one side trying in every possible way to start conversation while the other responds with yes or no answers. When someone actually asks me a question and shows interest in me I might just fall head over heels.....whether it is via text or face to face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I was single and living in 1980 instead of single in 2007&#8230;.of course in my experience usually even after incessant text messaging conversation could still be found if both parties were trying. It seems that the case is often one side trying in every possible way to start conversation while the other responds with yes or no answers. When someone actually asks me a question and shows interest in me I might just fall head over heels&#8230;..whether it is via text or face to face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-4965</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/#comment-4965</guid>
		<description>Interesting comparison, but I&#039;m not sure I see the difference (other than the devices used).  In both, conversations occur; the whole &quot;getting to know you&quot; is taking place in both forms.  In both scenarios, enough information has been exchanged to know if the ask for/accept date is worth it.  Chemistry, at least in its earliest bubbling forms, is there or the date wouldn&#039;t happen.  Perhaps, given all the conversation prior to the date, 2007&#039;s first date is more analogous to the 1980&#039;s second date?

That said, I, too, am glad to be old(er) and married.  Dating, regardless of technologies involved, is a pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comparison, but I&#8217;m not sure I see the difference (other than the devices used).  In both, conversations occur; the whole &#8220;getting to know you&#8221; is taking place in both forms.  In both scenarios, enough information has been exchanged to know if the ask for/accept date is worth it.  Chemistry, at least in its earliest bubbling forms, is there or the date wouldn&#8217;t happen.  Perhaps, given all the conversation prior to the date, 2007&#8217;s first date is more analogous to the 1980&#8217;s second date?</p>
<p>That said, I, too, am glad to be old(er) and married.  Dating, regardless of technologies involved, is a pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy K.</title>
		<link>http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/comment-page-1/#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghsprincipal.edublogs.org/2007/08/05/the-good-old-days/#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly!  I&#039;ll take the &quot;good old days&quot; any time!

I&#039;m also glad to be &quot;old and married&quot; and don&#039;t have to go through the dating game anymore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly!  I&#8217;ll take the &#8220;good old days&#8221; any time!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also glad to be &#8220;old and married&#8221; and don&#8217;t have to go through the dating game anymore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
